
Niklas studied at the University of Cologne and at the Victoria University in Melbourne. He received his degree in economics in summer 2010. Alongside his studies, he worked as a research assistant and tutor at the Jean Monnet Chair of Prof. Wessels at the University of Cologne and completed an internship at the broadcasting studio of the Second German Public Television (ZDF) in Brussels. As part of the EXACT - Marie Curie ITN on EU External Action, he worked for the Centre for European Policy Studies and the Finish Institute for International Affairs. His research focuses on the institutional evolution of the Common Foreign and Security Policy and the post of the High Representative.
| October 2010 – February 2011 | University of Cologne |
| March 2011 – October 2011 | The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels |
| November 2011 – March 2012 | The Finnish Institute of International Affairs (FIIA), Helsinki |
| April 2012 – September 2013 | University of Edinburgh |
Title of research project: "Leader or laggard? The High Representative and the institutionalisation of leadership in CFSP"
Supervisor: Professor John Peterson (University of Edinburgh)
Co-Supervisor: Professor Wolfgang Wessels (University of Cologne)
Since its establishment in 1993 the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) was subject to a process of institutionalisation with an increase of provisions, instruments and institutional actors. This process temporarily ended with the creation of the High Representative of the Union (HRVP) and the European External Action Service (EEAS) with the Lisbon treaty. The aim of the constant reform of the CFSP was to provide an orchestrated foreign policy of the member states of the EU. However, CFSP has still preserved its intergovernmental nature. This creates a demand for leadership in order to internally agree on policies and represent them towards third parties. How does the institutionalisation of the CFSP affect the allocation and performance of leadership in this policy area?
The research will be based on a diachronic analysis comparing similar cases in the post-Maastricht, post-Amsterdam and post-Lisbon era. The aim is to identify conditions, options and limitations for the office of the High Representative of the Union to exert leadership, based on experiences of 17 years of CFSP.
Publications and Presentations:
Research Assistance